Job ID
1695715793
Duration
9179seconds
Summary
- No organization in the world is more concerned about leadership than the US Army. All of the major leadership theories have been financed by Department of Defense work. Officers familiar with leadership practices in the army once they retire, are sought by industries. This is why Stratified systems theory has been rejected for work in the Army.
- The work that was described today consists of consulting work where the client himself under the circumstances sets up its own internal working resource. It isn't a matter of buying in your consultants, bringing in the package in effect. One notes the possible development of at least four types of consultancy organization or institution externally.
- The possibilities, and I think through other professions and these all exist possibilities of partnership in the ordinary sense of partnership. Once you get up into however that is say category capability five consultant working at higher levels in client organizations they do increasingly become identified as individuals.
- I'm curious whether maintaining the open, trusting, fully on the table relationship between you two needed to necessarily have been stopped when you started dealing directly with John. I stopped being any kind of consultant and had just labor tasks to do. I much prefer the autonomy of having no formal job, just the employment without the job.
- I see consulting services as knowledge develops. It's possible to have some bits and pieces, personal effectiveness, phrase of development. But you can't have this without having reckless structure. Without a conception of manager subordinate relationships, accountability and minimal authority.
- One of the education exercises, and it really is a very simple 110 minutes, is tightly now the militaries, the armed services of countries have got this pretty well locked up. You can use a single title as a very excellent clarifying process. Two business units out of the 20 OD in CRA actually use it.
- The work that was described today consists of consulting work where the client himself under the circumstances sets up its own internal working resource. It isn't a matter of buying in your consultants, bringing in the package in effect. One notes the possible development of at least four types of consultancy organization or institution externally.
- The possibilities, and I think through other professions and these all exist possibilities of partnership in the ordinary sense of partnership. Once you get up into however that is say category capability five consultant working at higher levels in client organizations they do increasingly become identified as individuals.
- I'm curious whether maintaining the open, trusting, fully on the table relationship between you two needed to necessarily have been stopped when you started dealing directly with John. I stopped being any kind of consultant and had just labor tasks to do. I much prefer the autonomy of having no formal job, just the employment without the job.
- I see consulting services as knowledge develops. It's possible to have some bits and pieces, personal effectiveness, phrase of development. But you can't have this without having reckless structure. Without a conception of manager subordinate relationships, accountability and minimal authority.
- One of the education exercises, and it really is a very simple 110 minutes, is tightly now the militaries, the armed services of countries have got this pretty well locked up. You can use a single title as a very excellent clarifying process. Two business units out of the 20 OD in CRA actually use it.