Formatted Text
Speaker A Sat of social institutional development is to.
Speaker B Provide circumstances in terms of role relationships that is, conduct requirements, behavioral requirements such that every individual shall be free to use his or her temperament, express his or her temperament desires and so on to the full.
Speaker C In case you hadn't noticed, you don't have to share the values of the existing government in terms of the legislation that it's passing.
Speaker A Is that right?
Speaker C But you sure as hell are expected to behave in accord with them. And you don't tell the judge. Look, Judge, I've got high resistance to.
Speaker B Change proposition is that if we can give some meaning to let's just call it good organization for the moment that there is possible here a release of an enormous amount of human creativeness and satisfaction.
Speaker C So I'm saying understand the values implicit in your manager of procedures but whatever they are, you can expect that I can manually accord with them. That's democracy. We have this sense of self fair differentials and they're international.
Speaker D This means that people, human beings worldwide have this extraordinary internal sense of fairness.
Speaker B And for me another way of cutting into requisite organization is can we develop the kinds of institutions that provide opportunity for the expression of what I would call the phylogenic in individuals.
Speaker C And the values issue is to develop trust inducing constraints. Driving on one side of the road and not the other is a trust.
Speaker D And use and constraint.
Speaker A Is that righteous?
Speaker B That I think is the game that we're in. We're going to talk about developing effective institutions can be quite useful to have a pretty clear picture in mind of what you mean and how would you know if you had one?